Chapter Twenty Three: The Criminal and the Intent

The Columbusian, most Sovereign, itself, may have influenced the thought of this last particular flesh he took control of, but the human body is still capable of using its physiological functions to reach the point that his mind not only craves for the need to appeal to the deep rationalization of things in motivating the crime and its intent, and the exonerating justification of the killings he just committed; yet, it is also searching for the immediate retrieval of the superego in concluding things via the most logical order of things committed and the response to stimuli.

This may be a literary fiction that cannot do away with the function of the body's conscience, the delicate disposition of the soul, and that, by ultimately testing the argument, is quite very true. Help ultimately comes to the person in need.

So the manner of discourse has been repeatedly argued to make a clear case: Is it really capable of the things that can be justified or is it the product of pure hypocrisy of these so called conceited moral agents? Are the acts committed contribute to the total liberation of the soul from undue authority, and the past crimes that are both heinous and unforgivable? Is it a set of historical wrongs that truly needed correction, using every means possible, by hook or by crook?

Nobody knows for sure because philosophical agents are persuaded by reason, and reason only holds true in a predetermined set of beliefs learned in the early development of human life.

By then, it is now clear that the manufacture of monsters lie in these preconceived set of beliefs, and these beliefs sometimes survive in the form of urban legends where critical thinking has led many people to drive their minds totally crazy, like committing suicide when love fails or when living becomes anguishly unbearable.

Whether the monsters (pertaining to the mind's constructs) are visible or acting through an unsuspecting agent, it does not matter. An evil corruption presents itself as an opportunity to do great or to subscribe to all noble intentions that can be grasped by the human mind, but in the end collapses because of the weakness of the unfounded beliefs.

Deceit is real and self-righteousness is also fatal.

Do legends or lores proceed to be harmless while inside the motives of the actors carrying a propaganda without actually hurting their own eyes with the same venom that their tongues carry? Or were they shut down, locked inside a room, quiet and calm, but eternally closed to the comprehension of all potential agents?

Is it now the misguided criminal or the poison of the intent, the numbing of the superego and the exploitation of the poverty of understanding? Are the repeated arguments presented in this literary endeavor not enough deposition, enough to make a logical premise that ultimately quells the evil nature, and its actors that are pure bred accomplices?

Nothing is totally certain; the arguments will soon be repeated. The original intention of the Lore (the content of crimes embodied in monsters) is possibly doomed.

x----------x

Picture from Pexels.